Portfolio I Guide
Portfolio One is part of the application for required teaching (student teaching or teaching with a two-year permit).
Note that the course or statutory requirement is indicated in the rubric. Also note that some requirements are only for those persons certifying in specific subject areas or developmental levels.
Submit your portfolio electronically using our web-based portfolio site. Here is the sign-on information. Contact Karen if you have questions.See an example portfolio.
Each section based on one of the standards should have a cover page describing the evidence included in the section. Here is an example:
Standard 3 – Approaches to Learning Evidence 3.1 Reflective Paper on Rural Education EDWN 601 I've include this paper as evidence of my understanding of the different community settings in which children live. Different community settings affect students and parents. The main points of my paper are that rural communities are often high poverty areas and that many parents do not have any college education. Growing up in suburban Madison, I lived among a culture of high income and educational achievement. If I teach in a rural school of the sort I describe in my paper, I will need to maintain high academic expectations while adapting my instruction to the needs of students whose parents may have a low income and may not be college-educated. Evidence 3.2 Unit Modifications for Student Differences EDWN 601 & PI 34.15(4)(h) I have modified my unit on the Second World War to accommodate students with special needs. Please note that I adapted the tests and several reading assignments for students with reading and writing difficulties. I also reformatted some of the handouts for ease of use by physically disabled students. Evidence 3.3 Evaluation of Strengths and Weaknesses of an Instructional Unit PI 34.15(4)(c)(1-5) I evaluated the treatment of ethnic minorities and Wisconsin Indian tribes in a history textbook that my son uses in eighth grade. I was surprised that this new text mentions little or nothing of the roles of minorities or the tribal rights of Wisconsin tribes…. Evidence 3.4 For Teachers of Students Birth to 21 only:Journal Describing Early and Middle Childhood Practicum Experience My subject area does not include these developmental levels. |
Portfolio Evaluation Rubric I (Before Required Teaching)
The following are required evidence. You may wish to add additional evidence.
Evidence |
Advanced Skills (4) |
Excellent progress (3) |
Emerging Skills (2) |
Struggling (1) |
STANDARD 1: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
|
Resume and other evidence show an ability to clearly explain complex content ideas |
No mention of content deficiency is made, nor is there special notice of content knowledge |
Content deficits are addressed and improved, based on evaluation. |
Content accuracy or other difficulties are addressed in more than one evaluation |
STANDARD 2: INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT |
Evidence shows clear evidence and a thoughtful 'case study' discussion of student individual differences and experiences |
Evidence shows attention to student characteristics and experiences, lacks thoughtful discussion of their impact |
Evidence shows a beginning awareness of the individuality students bring to learning tasks. |
Evidence shows a lack of attention to individual differences. Reflections do not address this in a productive manner. |
STANDARD 3: APPROACHES TO LEARNING |
Evidence shows clear understanding of matching approaches to student needs. Assistive technology addressed. Reflections give evidence of regular attempts |
Writing shows an understanding of adapting instruction and some evidence of its beginning use |
Evidence shows an awareness of the need to adapt instruction without consistent evidence of doing it |
Evidence shows a lack of comfort with diverse needs and uncertainty how to work with them |
STANDARD 4: TEACHING STRATEGIES
|
Units and other evidence show regular use of multiple strategies including technology |
Units and other evidence show less frequent use of multiple methods |
Units and other evidence show use of a few methods with willingness to try more |
Units and other evidence focus primarily on 1-2 methods |
STANDARD 5: CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT
|
Paper reveals a clear match between stated philosophy & reinforcement of behavior |
Paper shows a slight inconsistency between the philosophy and its implementation |
A strong philosophy is evident, along with good intentions, but a lack of implementation is found |
Philosophy is weak as written, classroom management is inconsistent in practice |
STANDARD 6: COMMUNICATION
|
Evidence show effort to use many methods properly to communicate with others in a respectful and timely manner. Technology use apparent |
Evidence show general acceptability, but with some facet lacking (e.g. poor grammar, spelling, lack of promptness in communication) |
Weaknesses in communication have been pointed out and progress is being made in correcting any issues |
Communication skills are noted as areas for improvement without real progress made. Communication is either lacking or is detrimental |
STANDARD 7: CLASSROOM PLANNING
|
Reflective paper and evidence show quality planning for long and short-term |
Daily and other short term planning is a strength, but long term planning still needs improvement |
Paper indicates some problems with planning, but good progress is being made |
Planning is unrealistic and may lack focus. It is a frustrating task |
STANDARD 8: ASSESSMENT |
Reflective paper and rubric show a strong understanding and ability to use a variety of assessment tools. Well-designed rubric |
Reflective paper and rubric show an effort made to use a variety of assessment types. Good rubric |
Reflective paper and rubric show a willingness to create tests and quizzes, in addition to those provided by text. Awkward rubric |
Writing and rubric show a distinct discomfort with any assessment other than those provided by text |
STANDARD 9: REFLECTIVE PRACTICE |
Teaching journal provides clear evidence of realistic self monitoring, reflective practice is customary |
Teaching journal provides examples of reflective practice not quite a habit |
Self reflective statements are found, but may be infrequent or too strongly positive or negative to be helpful |
A lack of self reflection seems to be detrimental to the teaching experience |
STANDARD 10: CONNECTION WITH OTHERS |
Evidence reveals a strong commitment to interaction with others. Evidence of efforts made to maintain positive relationships. Technology use apparent |
Evidence shows strong interactions with a core group |
Evidence shows efforts made to establish interactions with others, not yet consistent |
Evidence shows a tendency to avoid interaction |
