
EdNova Portfolio Guide
The purpose of this guide is to help you create the portfolio that demonstrates your growth in the ten Wisconsin Teacher Standards.
Organize your portfolio in ten chapters – one for each standard. You will submit parts of this portfolio before (the white areas of the grid below) and some parts after required teaching (the gray areas of the grid below). Green links indicate more information to be found elsewhere. Some requirements are only for those persons certifying in specific subject areas or developmental levels.
Submit your portfolio electronically using our web-basd portfolio site. Here is the sign-on information. Contact Karen if you have questions. See an example portfolio.
Each section based on one of the standards should have a cover page describing the evidence included in the section; the evidence should follow. Here is an example of one cover page:
Standard 3 – Approaches to LearningEvidence 3.1 Evaluation of strengths and weaknesses in terms of minority relations of an instructional unit you taught I taught a unit on mathematical calculations needed to develop a financial spreadsheet. For that unit I used a web site that I believe to be useful and added my own materials. I realized that the web site was really designed for persons with substantial financial resources, so in my own additions I made modifications more appropriate to my students experience…. Evidence 3.2 Unit Modifications for Student Differences I have modified my unit on the Second World War to accommodate students with special needs and learning preferences. Also note that I adapted the tests and several reading assignments for students with reading and writing difficulties. I also reformatted some of the handouts for ease of use by a physically disabled student. |
EdNova Portfolio
Evidence |
Advanced Skills (4) |
Excellent progress (3) |
Emerging Skills (2) |
Struggling (1) |
STANDARD 1: CONTENT KNOWLEDGE |
Evidence shows clear competency in content area knowledge and pedagogy |
Evidence shows clear competency in content area knowledge |
No content deficiency is evident |
Content deficits are evident |
Transcripts |
||||
Praxis Test Scores |
||||
Resume |
||||
Evaluations by Supervising and Cooperating Teachers |
Evaluations show clear competency in content area knowledge and pedagogy |
Evaluations show competency in content area knowledge and pedagogy, with few suggestions for additional work |
Evaluations show competency in content area knowledge and pedagogy, with several suggestions for additional work |
Evaluations show a lack of competency in content area knowledge and pedagogy |
STANDARD 2: INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT |
Evidence shows clear understanding of matching approaches to student needs. Reflections give evidence of regular attempts. Technology use apparent. Evidence of student learning present. |
Evidence shows an understanding of adapting instruction and some evidence of its beginning use. Evidence of student learning present. |
Evidence shows an awareness of the need to adapt instruction without consistent evidence of doing it. |
Evidence shows a lack of comfort with diverse needs and uncertainty how to work with them |
For Teachers of Students Birth to 21 only: Journal Describing Early and Middle Childhood Practicum Experience |
||||
Modifications you made to a unit you taught addressing intellectual, social, and personal development of students |
Modifications show a good understanding of how student needs and abilities develop with age specifically address areas that the unit needed to match better to student needs |
Modifications show an understanding of how student needs and abilities develop with age and address somewhat the areas that the unit needed to match student needs |
Modifications show an understanding of how student needs and abilities develop with age, but don’t fully address those needs and abilities |
Modifications show a lack of understanding of how student needs and abilities develop with age, modifications are minimal or cosmetic |
STANDARD 3: APPROACHES TO LEARNING |
Evidence shows clear evidence of teaching to individual student differences and experiences. Evidence of student learning present. |
Evidence shows attention to student characteristics and experiences, lacks thoughtful discussion of their impact. Evidence of student learning present. |
Evidence shows a beginning awareness of the individuality students bring to learning tasks. |
Evidence shows a lack of attention to individual differences. Reflections do not address this in a productive manner. |
Evaluation of strengths and weaknesses in terms of minority relations of an instructional unit PI 34.15(4)(c) (1-5) |
||||
Modifications to a unit you taught for Student Differences PI 34.15(4)(h) |
Unit modifications clearly address the needs of a special student (LD, ED…) and provide meaningful ways for the student to interact with the material |
Unit modifications address the needs of a special student (LD, ED…) and provide different ways for the student to interact with the material |
Unit modifications address the needs of a special student (LD, ED…) but seldom provide ways for the student to interact with the material |
Unit modifications do not address the needs of a special student (LD, ED…) and provide meaningful ways for the student to interact with the material |
STANDARD 4: TEACHING STRATEGIES |
Evidence shows regular use of multiple strategies including technology. Evidence of student learning present . |
Evidence shows less frequent use of multiple methods. Evidence of student learning present. |
Evidence shows use of a few methods with willingness to try more |
Evidence focuses primarily on 1-2 methods |
For Teachers of Students Birth to 21 only: Early and Middle Childhood Subject Area Unit |
||||
For Agriculture, Social Studies, & Science Teachers only: Environmental Education Unit Plan PI 34.15(4)(b) |
||||
Social Studies Teachers only: Cooperative marketing and consumer cooperatives unit PI 34.15(4)(a) |
||||
An analysis of the teaching strategies you used during your student teaching |
A section (1 page or less) of your reflective paper specifically discusses your use of various teaching strategies, including technology, in a thoughtful analysis |
A section (1 page or less) of your reflective paper specifically discusses your use of various teaching strategies, including technology |
A section (1 page or less) of your reflective paper mentions your use of various teaching strategies, including technology |
Your reflective paper does not obviously discuss your use of various teaching strategies, including technology |
An example of technology-based teaching strategies you used during student teaching |
||||
STANDARD 5: CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT |
Analysis of conflict resolution procedures is complete and related to current theory and practice. |
Analysis of conflict resolution procedures is complete but only somewhat related to current theory and practice. |
Analysis of conflict resolution procedures is incomplete or not related to current theory and practice. |
Analysis of conflict resolution procedures is incomplete and not related to current theory and practice. |
Analysis of the conflict resolution procedures in your school PI 34.15(4)(d) |
||||
Classroom Management Plan as implemented in your student teaching classroom |
Management plan shows respectful strategies for preventing and reinforcing student behaviors (good & bad) and encouraging student motivation |
Management plan shows strategies for preventing and reinforcing student behaviors (good & bad) and encouraging student motivation |
Management plan shows strategies for reinforcing student behaviors (good & bad) |
Management plan shows strategies punishing student behaviors |
STANDARD 6: COMMUNICATION |
Evidence shows consistent effort to use many methods properly to communicate with others in a respectful and timely manner. Technology use apparent. |
Evaluations are generally acceptable, but some facet lacking (e.g. grammar, spelling, lack of promptness in communication) |
Weaknesses in communication have been pointed out and progress is being made in correcting any issues |
Communication skills are noted as areas for improvement without real progress made. Communication is either lacking or is detrimental |
Selected samples of written communication with students |
||||
Analysis of video of your student teaching addressing your verbal and nonverbal communication skills |
Video analysis focuses on communication skills (verbal and nonverbal) in a careful self-examination |
Video analysis focuses on communication skills (verbal only) in a careful self-examination |
Video analysis describes communication skills (verbal and nonverbal) |
Video analysis describes communication skills (verbal only) |
STANDARD 7: CLASSROOM PLANNING |
||||
Example of long term planning and lesson plans you designed during your student teaching. |
Evidence both show quality planning for long and short-term |
Daily and other short term planning is a strength, but long term planning is still needs improvement |
Evidence indicates problems with planning, but good progress is being made. |
Planning is unrealistic and may lack focus. It is a frustrating task. |
STANDARD 8: ASSESSMENT |
||||
Examples of assessments you used during your student teaching including at least one performance assessment rubric |
Evidence shows a strong understanding and ability to use a variety of assessment tools. Good rubrics. Evidence of student learning present. |
Evidence shows an effort made to use a variety of assessment types. Good rubrics. Evidence of student learning present. |
Evidence shows a willingness to create tests and quizzes, in addition to those provided by text. Awkward rubrics |
Evidence shows a discomfort with any assessment other than those provided by text |
STANDARD 9: REFLECTIVE PRACTICE |
||||
Written reflection on your role as student teacher in working with students and teachers of special education (or with regular education teachers if you are a special education teacher)PI 34.15(4)(g) |
Teaching log and evaluations provide clear evidence of realistic self monitoring, reflective practice is customary |
Teaching log provides examples of reflective practice not quite a habit. Evaluations might not mention it |
Self reflective statements are found, but may be infrequent or too strongly positive or negative to be helpful |
A lack of self reflection seems to be detrimental to the teaching experience |
Student Teaching Log |
||||
STANDARD 10: CONNECTION WITH OTHERS |
Journal makes note of experiences with minority students and shows thoughtful reflection on interactions with all stakeholders in education |
Journal makes note of experiences with minority students and discusses interactions with students and at least 1 other stakeholder in education |
Journal makes note of experiences with minority students and describes interactions with students |
Journal makes note of experiences with minority students |
Journal of Practicum Experiences with Minority Students PI 34.15(4)(c)(6) |
||||
Samples of written communication with parents during student teaching |
Evidence reveals a strong commitment to interaction with others. Evidence of efforts made to maintain positive relationships Technology use apparent |
Evidence shows strong interactions with a core group |
Evidence shows efforts made to establish interactions with others, not yet consistent |
Evidence shows a tendency to avoid interaction |
